ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FOR GIFTED CHILDREN
http://www.iagcgifted.org  an affiliate of NAGC http://www.nagc.org/
=====================================
From: CATHY GREENE, Co-chair, IAGC Advocacy Committee

Subject: Budget hearing report
...
It would be impossible for anyone who was not in attendance at the February 27th House Appropriations Hearing in Springfield to get a sense of the atmosphere of the room. After waiting for over two hours,  after watching group after group approach the twelve Representatives in attendance asking for more money, after hearing group after group receive scolding after scolding from various Representatives regarding their requests, after listening to each group be peppered with questions, and contradicted in their answers, I can honestly say, we were not exactly looking forward to our turn at the testimony table.

For those of you who have not had the opportunity to testify at the Capitol in Springfield, let me try to paint a visual for you. When you walk into your assigned room, you see three to five rows of observer chairs. In front of the chairs there is a table with three microphones and an additional five chairs facing an imposing set a tiered seats. Each seat has a lighted name plate and a microphone available to each Representative should he or she wish to question the person who comes to testify.

Before we had an opportunity to speak, we heard testimony asking for additional funding for:

  • the National Board Certification Program - 5 Million more please
  • Children's Mental Health- 6 Million more please
  • Grow Your Own Teachers- 1.5 Million more please
  • After School Alliance- 4 Million more please
  • Blind and Visually Impaired students- 1 Million more please


Finally it was our turn. Naturally we followed the group representing the blind and visually impaired students- just our luck , the one group that garnered sympathy and approval from the Representatives.

The three gifted students who were with us had waited patiently for the first hour. The two little ones, both under eight years of age grew less patient and a little restless in the second hour. Our group did not look as professional as the groups that preceded us. They were suits and brochures. We were a little rumpled after our wait. We had after all a six year old, a seven year old and a twelve year old. The six year old had fallen asleep for a while but had perked up once again and was more than ready to leave, but it was our turn. We were eight strong at the table:

  • Marlie Smith
  • Liesl Smith
  • Dorie Self
  • Jeffery Self
  • Tim Foreman
  • Katie Forman
  • Susan Rhodes
  • Cathy Greene with Terry Mohaupt sitting in the gallery for support.


Seven year old Marlie Smith led off. She talked about what it was like to be a gifted child in a school without programming and what it was like to be a gifted child in a school that offered real services to gifted learners. She drew a picture that only a child can draw of a little girl who read Tolkien in a classroom that only offers phonics. She used the "Bored" word, but did it in such a way that one could not deny its existence. Her testimony garnered applause not only from the representatives but from the others who came to testify, the others who would be competing against Marlie for dollars. Next came Liesl, Marlie's mother who is as eloquent a speaker as I've ever heard. She speaks from the heart as a parent of a gifted child who worries every day about how she can make sure her child is learning. This is a mother who knows more about gifted education, the lack of federal and state funding than most school board members ever will and who was able to share her fears in a manner that connected with the Representatives. Applause followed once again.

Dorie Smith is Jeffery's mother, I don't believe that she would mind my sharing that Jeffery is a twice exceptional gifted child, both autistic and gifted,  who has struggled in several school settings and been kicked out of pre-schools because of his behavior before landing at Iles School, a school for gifted students, a school that can meet Jeffery's needs, a school where Jeffery finally is able to make it through the week without medication because his curriculum is matched to his abilities.

Susan Rhodes the principal of Iles school was eloquent as she described her school and what it offers gifted students, and how they fight to keep it open and what the loss of funding has meant to her and her teachers. As I listened to Susan and watched the Representatives I knew that they understood who the students were that we are fighting for and why there needs to be money in the ISBE budget for these students.

Tim Foreman talked about his daughter Katie who is accelerated in math and his fears regarding what will happen to her when they reach the end of the acceleration options. He noted that he was in a financial position to pay for programming for Katie, but noted that many families are not as financial able and wondered about the state's responsibilities to those children and their families.

I ended our testimony indicating that our group was different, that we were the one group that was not asking for more money. We were the only group asking for a line item. We were asking to be put back in the budget after being removed because Gifted students were the one group that had been singled out for removal, and we were concerned about the message that sent to school boards.

We had much encouragement from the Representatives. Representative Flowers said that she wished she could clone Susan Rhodes and her school. Representative Coulson said that we had the support of many of the committee members, but we needed a majority of the representatives to get ourselves back in the budget. So our work is cut out for us, but we do know what works now. It will take parents and teachers working together to get this job done. It is the connection with the children that makes the difference for the legislators.  It will take parents and teachers making contacts with legislators with students in hand. It has to happen quickly, but it can be done.  A visit to your local legislator can be a quick after school stop. It can take only a few minutes to introduce your child and to tell your story. I know that Marlie talked for fewer than three minutes, but  I can honestly tell you that our group would not have made the impact it did without Marlie Smith. She paved the way for us. Representatives saw asynchronous development at its best in Marlie. They saw a little girl squirming in her seat as she waited her turn. They saw a little girl up out of her seat coming and going as her mother tried to keep her occupied for over two hours, and then they heard he. Committee Chairman Michael Smith said, "Can we vote for her for governor? " If we are lucky maybe someday we can. A lot will depend on what we do next.
c

IAGC Advocacy Committee
GOAL
: Educate the decision-makers about the needs of gifted children
Co-Chairs:

  • Cathy Greene - Normal greeneca@unit5.org
  • Nancy Hertzog - Champaign nhertzog@uiuc.edu
  • Kris McElligatt - Mt. Prospect kmcellig@comcast.net


"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world's problems."- Mahatma Gandhi

=====================================
by Terry James Mohaupt - Rockford tmohaupt@chicago.us.mensa.org
Chair, Parent Affiliates
GOALS
:
1 - Increase the networking opportunities for parents of 165,000+ students throughout 893 school districts in Illinois
2 - Assist all parents with ways to advocate for their children.

Representative Flowers quoted from the Illinois Constitution: "...all students are to be educated to their capacity...."


Please forgive any duplication because you are on more than one list.